Browsed by
Category: Funding

The French Fries Test

The French Fries Test

Image by Matthias Böckel from Pixabay

From what we’ve been hearing from the investors whom we know personally, the funding purse strings are opening up again, and mergers are moving forward.

We hosted Jonathan Hakakian of SoundBoard VC at last week’s Online Insights, and part of the discussion centered around changes on how VCs vet startups. Yes, they’re still vetting decks, doing their due diligence and all that, but many meetings are still held over Zoom or some other such platform. Which means that funds have eased the requirements in terms of geolocation. Many VC/Angel firms don’t even feel the need to have a dedicated office. Some use co-working spaces to have somewhere to hold meetings from time to time, and for conference room access. Offices, for both investors and founders, are no longer necessary, at least, in some cases, not until you’ve reached a certain stage.

Jonathan has returned to taking in-person meetings, circumstances permitting, meaning, when it’s geographically possible for him and the founder/founding team. And there are times when they’ll keep it casual, meeting at a diner or restaurant. There is a different dynamic at in-person meetings, but still important to mind your Ps and Qs – and your table manners. Read More...

LLMs and the Way Back Machine*

LLMs and the Way Back Machine*

Image by Pete Linforth from Pixabay

First, a bit of history. At the dawn of the Web 1.0 era, everyone felt the need to have a presence on this new information superhighway.  Something. Anything. Businesses/corporations started putting up websites, which by today’s standards were placeholders, for which they paid millions to early web-focused ad agencies/web dev shops. But consultants to whom they paid thousands/hour advised them that this was what they needed to do, or their businesses/corporations would become irrelevant in this new tech age. For context, HTML coders were commanding salaries well into six figures. A lot of money was being thrown at a lot of youth and inexperience – web shops where the founders knew nothing about business, luckily, working with clients who knew nothing about the web. If the young founders walked into a client meeting with a palm pilot, they were clearly members of the digerati and you needed to go along with anything they said.

These young companies were renting way more office space than they needed, hiring way more employees than they needed, and were running out of money, so they’d throw a party, get some press, and get acquired by a large company/corporation. Who’d learn too late that they’d acquired little more than smoke and mirrors. But what they really bought was the hype.

Which is a large part of the reason why the Web 1.0 bubble burst. Read More...

A Much-Needed Perspective on Investors

A Much-Needed Perspective on Investors

Image by Stefan Schweihofer from Pixabay

We were in an online webinar recently, with a young investor as the guest speaker on the virtual dais. He is a former founder with several failures and one success under his belt. Given the fact that he has sat on both sides of the table, we were particularly curious about his investment approach, especially since he is a partner in a quite large fund.

While he is new to the investment side of the table, he has already developed his philosophy: if he is predisposed to investing in a company, he advises the founder to get some traction – meaning paying customers – and check back with him in a few months, whether the founder had achieved this or not. After said time, provided the founder is in the same position monetarily, he advises a pivot.

He does position himself as a very early-stage investor. Maybe not back-of-the-napkin, but fairly close. Read More...

Zombie VCs: the Era of the Walking Dead Funds

Zombie VCs: the Era of the Walking Dead Funds

Image by Izzy Loney from Pixabay

VCs ask founders a lot of questions. It’s a big part of their job. They’re deploying other people’s money and just as founders have an obligation to make money for their investors, venture firms have an obligation to bring preferably significant returns to theirs.

Founders need to ask investors questions, too. The most important one (or two): are you still deploying funds/when was the last time you made an investment?

PitchBook recently reported that the number of VCs in US deals peaked at 18,504 in 2021 and fell to 9,966 last year. Read More...

CHARGE!

CHARGE!

Photo by Harri P on Unsplash

We recently hosted a very successful serial founder and sometime investor at our online Investor Insights, who just launched yet another company – his third. It was fascinating to listen to both his advice – and his history. His first company was quickly acquired by Google, which was ‘clearly’ a win, but careful there, founders: great to be ‘adopted,’ but not all ‘parent’ companies are the same. He served his time, celebrated the day the golden handcuffs came off, and quickly launched his next company, which pivoted a few times, as all companies do, but did find its footing and a sustainable revenue stream. Acquisition offers were proffered and rejected, perhaps since the entrepreneur had been there, done that.

The company is still alive and well and turning a profit to the tune of hundreds of millions a year.

Nice revenue stream. Read More...

That Wild, Wild Web: NOT a Tale of Web 3.0

That Wild, Wild Web: NOT a Tale of Web 3.0

Image by PublicDomainPictures from Pixabay

Tech is and has been referred to as the wild, wild west since the early days of Web 1. Like those pioneers who ventures out into terra incognita when the west was being settled, those web pioneers didn’t know what they’d find, and even in their travels, they were making it up as they went along.

Head’s up: the same goes for investors. There’s no startup handbook, although there are books that bear that title. There’s no investor handbook, either. Which is why founders may hear one thing from one investor, get totally different feedback/advice from another. And yet different feedback/advice from a third, and so it may go, all the way down the line.

  Read More...

The Tortoise and the Huh???

The Tortoise and the Huh???

How often have we heard that slow and steady wins the race? We’ve been looking at funding reports lately and there’s no doubt that this has been a banner year for both funding – and exits. Win-win for both sides of the table, and all the better when seemingly everyone wins, what, eh? Or do they? And funding, in some cases, seems to be happening at incredible speeds.

 

According to Pitch Book, Venture capital rewrites the record books, with “Venture-backed companies having attracted $150 billion in 2021, more than 90% of last year’s record total…IPOs and SPACs helped to drive the exit value of venture-backed companies to $372.2 billion in the first half of 2021. That was 30% higher than 2020’s all-time record…Firm-level fundraising also (took off), with investors closing funds worth $74.1 billion, about 91.5% of 2020’s record-breaking amount.  And Deals, exits, funds—US VC’s records for value are going to get even bigger Read More...

Inside Investor Baseball: Here’s the Pitch

Inside Investor Baseball: Here’s the Pitch

Image by Сергей Ремизов from Pixabay

Ok, so you’ve done your pitch deck – revised it ad infinitum, based on the feedback you’ve gotten from everyone you know and his or her fourth cousin twice removed. Now you’ve secured a few investor meetings, via Zoom. Where’s that investor pitch meeting template when you need one?

Brian Cohen spoke at our virtual investor breakfast recently and imparted some pearls of advice to help you with that one, some of which we’ll share with you today, with a few additions of our own, along with points other investor friends and previous Investor breakfast speakers of ours have made in the pas.

First, meetings these days are done via Zoom. Show your face. At least at the outset of the meeting. Not a photo, nyour initials, not your LinkedIn photo, which is no doubt a selfie and doesn’t look all that great anyway – the real you – and the other team members who may also be on the call. Why? Investor(s) want to get to know you and yours, and much is conveyed via your visage and facial expressions. Do you smile? At least occasionally? Investors – and Brian referred primarily to angels – after all, he was Chairman of the New York Angels for a decade before co-founding New York Venture Partner – and has invested in literally hundreds of companies over the years – have to like you. This is a partnership and a potentially a long one, so they want to see you – if only on a video call. For now, at least. Read More...

Trends in Funding: The Silicon Valley Climate Change

Trends in Funding: The Silicon Valley Climate Change

Image by Tumisu from Pixabay

If you want to know what investors are thinking/looking at these days, a must-read is Elizabeth Yin’s (@dunkhippo33 @HustleFundVC – VC investing in hilariously-early founders) recent series of tweets:

“1) At the early stages (call it pre-A or the whole “seed range”), I’m seeing lots of bifurcation. On one hand, in the Silicon Valley, for some founders, it’s never been an easier time to raise. 2) These founders, largely serial entrepreneurs/pedigreed founders (based on schools & work), are highly sought after even at the pre-seed stage. 3) So with these founders (mostly in SF), I’m seeing massive party rounds — like $3m-$5m seed rounds. Sometimes higher! No product / no traction. My friend – fantastic founder – raised $8m recently. $30m+ post-money, no product. If you have this background, raising is EASY. 4) For non-pedigreed founders, if you are running a SaaS company & have some rev traction, also pretty easy to raise. VCs have gone gaga over SaaS in the last 2 months. They think predictable cap efficient companies are the way to go in light of issues at unnamed marketplace cos 5) And then, there’s everyone else. Still HARD to raise money. Even in the Bay Area, if you don’t check said boxes above. Outside the SF Area, even harder. 6) So we have a weird Goldilocks & the 3 bears situation. Some companies are really HOT. Others are really cold. The range of valuations are insane. Everything from < $1m post valuations to $30m+ for PRE-SEED! 7) The press mostly writes about the hot deals. After all, no one wants to read about someone’s poor fundraising situation. So, now everyone thinks Silicon Valley is littered with gold. The reality is that SF mostly has poop on the ground. 8) Then there’s the downstream. The later stages. In 2020, I think raising a series A or a series B will become incredibly challenging. (fundraising always is, but even more so than last yr). 9) Why? VCs all of a sudden care about profitability. Your co still needs to be growing at 30% MoM AND also profitable!  (unclear why you need VC in this case but that’s beside the pt 🙂 )”

Actually, that is the point.

We know that raising funding is considered by many an entrepreneur to be a trophy of sorts, or a even proof of concept. Great! If you need the confirmation, go talk to investors – but bootstrap as long as you can. As an investor pointed out at one of our breakfasts, once you’re on the VC treadmill, there’s no getting off. And it’s not free money: You’ll be under more pressure and scrutiny that comes with it, especially in this funding climate. Read More...