We often get reader feedback/notes and have received several lately that brought various points to our attention which we feel are worth sharing.

One such reader is a so-called minority. We’ve met in person. We do not know his vax status, neither do we care, nor is it any of our business. He did note that with all the various programs that people, establishments and companies have put in place on both the private and professional fronts, whenever he is asked to show his proof of vax, qua ‘papers’ (unheard of since the Nazi era), what he feels is something not unfamiliar to him:

Discrimination.

What is being instituted is an apartheid system, plain and simple: we’ve merely moved the cheese.

One step forward, two steps back.

And possibly worse: It’s not even about the vaccine: it’s about the vaccine passport – and other information that may be included in them now and in the future – and well we know that once the government puts a program into place – even a so-called temporary one – it’s there forever. Note that there was a six-month gas surcharge tax instituted in New York during the gas shortage of the ‘70s. It was supposed to sunset after six months. It’s still there.

“Show Proof of Vax” signs have shown up all over NYC in the past week, another reader reported, despite the fact that, contrary to what has been reported in much of the media, The FDA did NOT grant full approval to the Pfizer shots. The FDA actually extended rather than approved the EUA for the Pfizer vaccine, while granting approval to a different vaccine called “Comirnaty,” which does not exist in the US marketplace and isn’t even in production, according to Natural News (FDA gaslights the world with FAKE “approval” of Pfizer vaccine). In other Pfizer news, Pfizer has reached a $486 million settlement of litigation accusing it of causing big losses for shareholders by concealing safety risks associated with its Celebrex and Bextra pain-relieving drugs. And we’re sure that Pfizer wouldn’t dream of concealing safety risks when it comes to its experimental, EUA gene therapy/vaccine where they are subject to no liabilities at all.

It’s basically a game of three-card monte, another reader noted.

Emergency Use only. Even the CDC’s own director (Rochelle) Walensky admits this “vaccine” doesn’t halt transmission and doesn’t prevent infections. It merely reduces symptoms, which allows infected people to become superspreaders because they appear to be asymptomatic while they actually carry a far higher viral load.”

A must-watch: Dr Christina Parks testimony for Michigan HB4471 on 8 19 21, on segregation, discrimination, and the efficacy of the mRNA vaccines re the Delta variant. The PhD in cellular and molecular biology notes that the vaccines “merely attenuate symptoms for the first variant, which is essentially gone. CDC Director Walensky said these vaccines have no ability to prevent transmission by and infection of the delta variant.”

As for vaccine mandates, as Childrens Health Defense noted, “EUA products are experimental under U.S. law. Both the Nuremberg Code and federal regulations provide that no one can force a human being to participate in this experiment. Under 21 U.S. Code Sec.360bbb-3(e)(1)(A)(ii)(III), “authorization for medical products for use in emergencies,” it is unlawful to deny someone a job or an education because they refuse to be an experimental subject. Instead, potential recipients have an absolute right to refuse EUA vaccines… The FDA (and the media) appears to be purposefully tricking American citizens into giving up their right to refuse an experimental product.”

As for PCR tests which have been widely used to determine the presence of cases of Covid, the CDC and FDA quietly said they would abandon the PCR test in December 2021, acknowledging that it did not work. “When test labs run the tests at 35 cycles or higher (increased sensitivity), the results are meaningless, AND positive results pour forth like water out of a fire hose, creating the impression of many new COVID cases. Fauci himself readily asserted that the test run at 35 or higher is meaningless. BUT FDA documents recommended running the test at up to 40 cycles. So labs followed suit.”

So, why were the PCR tests used at all, when FDA document admits “Covid” PCR test was developed without isolated samples for test calibration, effectively admitting it’s testing something else, and The inventor of PCR said it wasn’t designed to detect infectious diseases? Who was a Nobel laureate, btw. And now suspended, come December? Seems George Soros And Bill Gates’ Backed Consortium To Buy U.K. Maker Of Covid Tests For $41 Million. What to speak of the fact that Dr. Fauci et al do profit greatly from the vaccines. Always a good idea to follow the money.

Why are we seeing more and more vax mandate when, according to an Israeli Study: Natural Immunity Is 13x Stronger Than Pfizer COVID Shots?

Don’t shoot the messenger: we’re merely citing the experts and readers.

Elsewhere in sensationalist misreporting: ‘Like Tuskegee’: Southern Jail Treats COVID With Dangerous, Unproven Drug Ivermectin, said the Daily Beast. FYI, Ivermectin is on the World Health Organization’s List of Essential Medicines, and has been prescribed for medical use since 1981. We endorse no particular medications. This newsletter is for informational purposes only and is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment.  Always seek the advice of your physician with any questions you may have.  We are simply commenting on reportage and issues of the day.

What does all this have to do with tech? Tech has a long history of normalizing what amounts to discrimination and given the censorship that the tech cabal has been practicing for some time now to muzzle open discussion and elevate the fear factor, a lot. It’s unconscionable, considering that deaths and serious injuries from the vaccines are on the rise globally.

As New York Times reporter @ Alex Berenson noted,

“1/ The UK has stunningly detailed and up-to-date mortality statistics. With a lag of under two weeks, it reports deaths by age and cause – and compares them to the expected number.
The figures paint a troubling picture. In the last few weeks, excess deaths have turned positive…
2/ After months in which they were negative. We thought excess mortality would be negative for a year-plus after Covid ended – many people who die from Covid are near the end of life, so those deaths were being pulled forward. That was the spring pattern. Now it’s changed…
3/ And not (only) because Covid is back. No, something specific is happening. Cancer and some lung disease deaths remain low, for example. But cardiac and stroke deaths are significantly higher than normal, and rising…
4/ And rates for younger people are strikingly higher than normal and rising (though they are still only a tiny fraction of overall deaths).

Maybe delayed care explains this pattern. But then why is it so centered around heart and not cancer deaths?

Something bad is happening.

5/ And no, I don’t know what. But we’d be well-advised to find the answer as soon as possible, and ideally BEFORE we start hitting the population with yet more mRNA.”

While science seems to have gone the way of the dodo, as one of our NYC-based reader noted, what we currently are witnessing is “A (new??) form of discrimination invented and promoted (illegally) right under our noses! And everybody seems to think its Ok. After civil rights, gay rights, and human rights we have: “No person who refuses to risk their lives, souls and conscience allowed to eat here”… and also no dogs!”

Although we do believe he might have misspoken when he included dogs. All things considered, that seems to be where the world is currently going.

We were recently invited to a private event where it was passport required. All good, but we’re still of the mind that anywhere we need to go that requires a passport better have a foreign destination waiting on the other side, ripe with a photo opp postable to the gram. The current passport requirements are merely leading us into terra incognita and even further down the rabbit hole. Not going there as we go onward and questionably forward.